"Sustainability" and "Solvency" as Sabotage

what is it you're most interested in trying to keep alive?

In healthcare, "sustainability" is often a catch-all term used to justify a broad range of policies and decisions. However, this term frequently serves as a smokescreen, obscuring a complex web of political, economic, and social agendas that undermine the goal of a fair and effective healthcare system. Central to this rhetoric is the notion of solvency—a concept often portrayed as an imminent crisis threatening public healthcare unless drastic, often harmful, measures are enacted.

When we peel back the layers, the so-called solvency crisis emerges not as an inevitable outcome but as a manufactured construct—deliberately engineered to advance specific ideological and economic interests at the expense of public health. This essay seeks to uncover how the "solvency crisis" is employed as a tool to dismantle public healthcare, privatize services, and prioritize profit over people.

The Many Faces of "Sustainability" in Health Politics: What Are We Truly Sustaining?

"Sustainability" in health politics is a multifaceted concept, its meaning shifting depending on context and agenda. In the United States, the rhetoric of financial sustainability is often manipulated to justify the increasing privatization of healthcare. Politicians argue that Medicare and Medicaid are becoming "unsustainable," leading to reforms that typically include cutting benefits, raising the eligibility age, or introducing more private insurance elements. This narrow focus on balancing budgets prioritizes the system's financial health over the well-being of the population, particularly affecting vulnerable groups who rely on these programs.

In the United Kingdom, the NHS has made strides toward reducing its environmental impact through initiatives like the Greener NHS campaign. These efforts are crucial for addressing the healthcare sector's contribution to climate change and ensuring long-term environmental sustainability. However, it is essential that these environmental goals complement, rather than conflict with, the immediate healthcare needs of patients. The emphasis on environmental sustainability must work in tandem with the NHS's mission to provide timely, high-quality care to all.

Meanwhile, in Australia, the notion of social sustainability in healthcare has become a battleground for equitable access, particularly between rural and urban populations. The rhetoric surrounding social sustainability is often exploited to maintain the status quo rather than to address systemic inequalities that hinder access to healthcare for marginalized communities. This perpetuation of inequality under the guise of sustainability raises fundamental concerns about the true objectives of these policies.

So, what are we truly sustaining? If financial sustainability in the U.S. prioritizes cost over care, environmental sustainability in the UK sidelines patient needs, and social sustainability in Australia perpetuates inequality, then the rhetoric of sustainability is fundamentally flawed. True sustainability must integrate financial, environmental, and social dimensions in a way that prioritizes human health and dignity above all.

Solvency as a Manufactured Crisis: Exposing the Hidden Agenda

The narrative of a solvency crisis is a calculated deception, wielded as a tool to implement austerity measures, privatization, and other policies that erode public healthcare systems across different countries.

In the United States, the myth of Medicare insolvency is frequently cited to justify raising the eligibility age or cutting benefits. These policies conveniently ignore the underlying issue of rising healthcare costs driven by private insurance companies and pharmaceutical giants, who profit from a system that prioritizes market-driven care over public health. The narrative of insolvency is less about the actual financial stability of Medicare and more about advancing an agenda that favors private interests.

In the United Kingdom, the NHS has been under constant pressure, with claims that it is unsustainable in its current form. These assertions have been used to justify the creeping privatization of NHS services, with private firms increasingly taking on contracts for services once wholly provided by the public sector. This strategic undermining of the NHS is presented as necessary for its survival, yet it ultimately serves to weaken public trust in a system designed to serve all equally.

In Australia, the proposed introduction of co-payments for GP visits in 2014 was presented as a measure to ensure the financial sustainability of Medicare. The government argued that without such measures, Medicare would become unsustainable. However, this narrative was a smokescreen for shifting costs onto patients, particularly affecting low-income individuals who rely heavily on bulk-billed services. By framing the solvency of Medicare as a crisis, the government sought to justify policies that would ultimately reduce access to care for those most in need.

In each of these cases, the solvency narrative is not a reflection of economic necessity but a deliberate strategy to justify austerity, privatization, and the erosion of public healthcare. The result is a deepening of inequality and a weakening of the systems designed to protect public health.

The "Look! It's Not Working" Tactic: Undermining Public Healthcare

One of the most insidious tactics employed within the solvency narrative is the "Look! It's Not Working" strategy, which is used to undermine public healthcare systems by pointing to the very struggles caused by underfunding and austerity.

In the United States, critics of Medicare often highlight its rising costs and projected insolvency as evidence that the program is unsustainable. However, these costs are largely driven by the inefficiencies of the broader U.S. healthcare system, including the exorbitant prices charged by private providers and pharmaceutical companies. The solution to Medicare's challenges is not to cut benefits or raise eligibility but to address these underlying cost drivers that make healthcare unaffordable for so many.

In the United Kingdom, austerity measures imposed after the 2008 financial crisis led to significant underfunding of the NHS. Critics then pointed to the resulting staff shortages, long wait times, and service cutbacks as evidence that the NHS was failing. However, these issues were a direct result of the underfunding and austerity policies, not a failure of the public healthcare model itself. The "Look! It's Not Working" tactic is a form of gaslighting, designed to create a self-fulfilling prophecy where the public loses faith in the NHS, paving the way for further privatization.

Similarly, in Australia, the public hospital system has faced criticism for long wait times and overcrowding, which some argue are signs that the public system is failing. However, these problems are often exacerbated by policies that direct resources away from public hospitals and toward private healthcare, reinforcing a two-tiered system that benefits those who can afford private care at the expense of those who cannot. This tactic of highlighting the struggles of an underfunded public system while ignoring the root causes serves to justify further cuts and the erosion of public trust in healthcare.

Reclaiming Public Healthcare: Challenging the Deception

To counter the solvency crisis narrative, it is essential to expose it as a deception. This requires challenging the notion that public healthcare systems are inherently unsustainable or destined to fail.

In the United States, we must highlight how Medicare’s so-called insolvency is largely a political construct, used to push for privatization rather than addressing the real cost drivers in healthcare. Expanding Medicare, rather than cutting it, could lead to a more sustainable system overall by reducing administrative costs and negotiating better prices for services and drugs. A shift in focus toward addressing the root causes of healthcare cost inflation, rather than targeting the beneficiaries of these programs, is critical.

In the United Kingdom, reclaiming the NHS from privatization requires reversing austerity measures and restoring adequate funding. It’s essential to demonstrate that the NHS is not failing because of its public nature, but because it has been systematically starved of resources. Restoring public confidence in the NHS depends on acknowledging the role that political decisions have played in its challenges and committing to reinvesting in this cornerstone of British society.

In Australia, challenging the co-payment narrative and other cost-shifting measures requires a focus on equitable access to healthcare. We must argue for a return to fully funded public services that do not place additional financial burdens on the most vulnerable. This involves rejecting the narrative that public healthcare is unsustainable and reaffirming the principle that access to healthcare should be based on need, not on the ability to pay.

By reclaiming the discourse around healthcare sustainability, we can advocate for systems that genuinely serve the people, prioritizing equity, access, and quality over profit and fiscal constraints. This requires a collective effort to challenge the status quo and to promote policies that truly reflect the values of justice, fairness, and human dignity.

Conclusion: Reclaiming True Sustainability

The sustainability debate in social welfare programs compels us to reconsider our priorities. Are we sustaining institutions merely to keep them operational, or are we upholding deeper values of equity, justice, and human well-being?

In the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, the manufactured solvency crisis has been used to justify policies that erode public healthcare systems. A comprehensive understanding of sustainability—one that encompasses economic, environmental, and social dimensions—ensures that these programs are not only financially sustainable but also capable of delivering equitable, high-quality care for all.

It’s time to reject the false narrative of the solvency crisis and fight for healthcare systems that truly sustain life—ones that are equitable, just, and centered on the needs of all individuals. This requires a collective effort to challenge the status quo, demand accountability, and push for a vision of healthcare that aligns with our deepest values. Only by doing so can we achieve truly sustainable healthcare systems—ones that serve the people rather than profits, prioritizing human well-being above all else.